ทันเอไอ

Global AI & tech news, in your language · every story source-checked

🌐Follow
← Back to news
Tools/Open SourceVerified

"AI 2040" plan to delay Superintelligence until 2040 criticized by George Hotz as mere "cult of intelligence"

Renowned hacker George Hotz criticizes the "AI 2040" proposal from a former OpenAI team, which aims to slow AI development and open-source all research, calling it a concept that overlooks physical realities.

📅 12 Jul 2026, 02:50
"AI 2040" plan to delay Superintelligence until 2040 criticized by George Hotz as mere "cult of intelligence"
ภาพประกอบ AI · ไม่ใช่ภาพเหตุการณ์จริง

This week's hot topic in the tech community is a critical article by George Hotz (geohot), hacker and founder of Comma.ai, concerning the "AI 2040: Plan A" proposal. This proposal, presented by a group of researchers who previously worked at OpenAI, offers a positive vision for the future of artificial intelligence.

The "AI 2040" proposal extends the "AI 2027" report written by the same team. In the earlier version, they predicted a worrying future where AI could lead to human extinction or totalitarian power centralization. However, "Plan A" proposes an idealistic solution: delaying superintelligence development until 2040, open-sourcing all AI research to decentralize technology, and creating a system for joint monitoring and curbing overly rapid development. The authors include prominent AI safety figures like Daniel Kokotajlo, Thomas Larsen, Eli Lifland, and Romeo Dean.

However, George Hotz countered in his blog, calling this concept part of a "cult of intelligence." He argues that intelligence is not the ultimate goal but merely a current bottleneck. Hotz points out that global domination cannot be achieved solely with "tokens" (basic data units processed by AI models) but requires control over real-world resources and supply chains.

Furthermore, Hotz criticized the AI 2040 report's illustrations of large floating data centers, labeling them as vaporware (software or hardware announced but never materialized). While easy to visualize, such projects would face immense engineering and logistical challenges. This sparked a widespread debate on Hacker News, with over 103 comments and 75 upvotes, reflecting extremely divergent views on future AI development.

Why it matters
This issue reflects a significant debate in the AI industry between those who want to accelerate development for profit and those concerned about safety who wish to slow it down. The outcome of this discussion will impact the future direction of AI technology, affecting everyone.
#AI Safety#George Hotz#Superintelligence#AI Governance

Related news

เครื่องมือ/โอเพนซอร์ส
AMD เปิดตัว 'Ryzen AI Halo' มินิพีซี AI ทรงพลัง แรม 128GB สำหรับนักพัฒนา ชนตรง NVIDIA
เครื่องมือ/โอเพนซอร์ส
นักพัฒนาทดลองใช้ AI สร้างเกม 'Thrust' (1986) ใหม่ ผลคือล้มเหลว แต่กลับพบประโยชน์ในการวิเคราะห์โค้ดโบราณ
เครื่องมือ/โอเพนซอร์ส
งานวิจัยใน Nature ชี้ AI ดันอาชีพนักวิจัยรายบุคคลโตเร็ว แต่ทำให้ภาพรวมวิทยาศาสตร์แคบลง
เครื่องมือ/โอเพนซอร์ส
เจอกระแสต้านหนัก Meta ถอนฟีเจอร์ AI สร้างภาพจากบัญชี Instagram สาธารณะ หลังเปิดตัวไม่กี่วัน